How we list and review clinics
Lifespan Solutions is a discovery and comparison platform. Before a clinic appears in the directory, we check that it is a real, identifiable provider — a genuine operating clinic with verifiable contact details — and we describe its services based on the clinic's own materials.
Where available, we surface independent Google reviews so you can see real patient feedback rather than only the clinic's own claims. Listings are kept under review and updated as information changes; many entries are added in draft and only published once checked.
"Verified" here means the listing has passed this review — it is not a medical endorsement, accreditation, or guarantee of treatment outcomes.
Editorial standards for our articles
Our articles and educational content are written to be accurate, evidence-aware and free of hype. They are provided for general information and education only and are not medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional about your own situation.
Where an article carries a "Scientifically reviewed" label, it has been checked for scientific accuracy before publication by our scientific lead, Aksana Labokha, PhD — a biotech executive who holds a doctorate in life sciences (biochemistry) and has spent 15+ years in ageing biology. We deliberately say scientifically, not medically, reviewed: our reviewer is a research scientist, not a practising physician, and our content is educational, not a clinical service. The "Last updated" date on each article reflects its most recent revision.
How we rate treatment evidence
Some treatment pages carry an evidence rating — a small badge labelled Established, Emerging, Experimental or Disproven. It describes how strong the scientific evidence is for that category of treatment for healthy ageing — not how popular it is, not how a specific clinic performs, and not a recommendation. The rating applies to the treatment type in general; individual protocols and providers vary.
Our tiers are a deliberately simplified, reader-friendly mapping of recognised evidence-grading systems used in medicine — in particular GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) and the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) Levels of Evidence. We collapse their detailed levels into plain-language buckets so non-specialists can quickly gauge how settled the science is.
Established
Backed by strong human evidence — large randomised controlled trials, or well-accepted standard medical practice. The benefit is well documented, even if the optimal protocol still varies. Examples: structured exercise, sleep optimisation, physiotherapy.
Emerging
There is a plausible biological mechanism and early or limited human data — often observational studies or trials using short-term or surrogate endpoints — but not yet robust long-term trials with hard outcomes. Promising and worth understanding, but not proven. Examples: sauna and cold exposure, red light therapy, NAD+ infusions.
Experimental
The longevity benefits are largely unproven, preliminary or contested, and marketing claims often run well ahead of the data. These may still be under investigation, but should be approached with extra caution and medical advice. Examples: exosome therapy, stem-cell therapy, ozone therapy, detox programmes.
Disproven
Well-designed studies have failed to show a longevity benefit, or the specific claim is contradicted by the weight of evidence. We use this tier sparingly and only where the science is clear; it refers to the longevity claim for that treatment category, not to every possible medical use of the intervention.
Evidence ratings are provided for general information only and are not medical advice. They can change as new research appears. Always discuss any treatment with a qualified clinician — see our medical disclaimer.
Independence
Lifespan Solutions is an independent platform and is not a healthcare provider. The clinics listed are independent third parties; medical decisions always belong to you and your doctors. For the full picture, read our medical disclaimer.
Corrections & content removal
If something on the site is inaccurate or out of date — or if you represent a listed clinic and want a correction or removal — please contact us and we'll review it.
Last updated: 30 June 2026